Thu 11 May 2006
Top Economists, Russia’s Ex-PM Warns Europe of Steep Rise in Gas Price
Posted by diderot under Peakist , Energy , Gazprom , Gas
European energy consumers face further big rises in gas prices in the coming years because of acute shortages of Russian supplies and growing tensions between the Kremlin and EU, senior economists and a former Russian premier said Wednesday.
Eric Berglof, chief economist at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, told MEPs and senior EU officials that Gazprom, the Russian gas group majority-owned by the state, would struggle to offset declines in output, but demand from Europe and ex-Soviet Union countries would grow at 2-3% a year, The Guardian reported.
Berglof told the European Enterprise Institute that 70% of production at Gazprom, the world’s third-largest energy group, came from fields whose gas was running out, while the Russian energy sector needed a $700bn investment over the next 20 years — much of it from foreign interests so far denied access to the Russian pipeline network. Berglof, founder of a Moscow economic think-tank, warned that without serious reforms of both Gazprom and Russia’s energy sector, prices for domestic use and export could double by 2010.
Christian Cleutinx, head of EU-Russian energy dialogue at the European commission, said the EU would be 80% dependent on gas imports by 2030 as demand rose by 60%. But, he said, Russia planned to export only an extra 50 million tons of gas to all countries, not just the EU, by 2020, leaving Europe 150 million tons short and forcing it to use other countries. To raise Russian output by 50 million tons would need investment of up to $200 billion.
The warnings came as prospects for a breakthrough in talks on a proposed energy security pact at July’s G8 summit in St Petersburg, hosted by President Vladimir Putin, all but collapsed. Separate talks on an EU-Russia energy charter have also run into the sand. Mikhail Kasyanov, Russian premier from 2000 to 2004 and presidential hopeful in 2008, said: “These problems [on mutual access to pipelines, foreign investment and price] are destroying the whole mood of our relationship, with mistakes on both sides.”
The architect of the original EU-Russia energy dialogue, he warned that the EU’s search for diversified supplies was viewed in Russia as a drive to freeze it out and Russia needed at least observer status at talks to form a common European energy policy and single market.
Berglof added: “We won’t see progress at the G8 and, after that, further deterioration coming from fundamental trends in Russia and its economic and political system. But there is pressure for greater energy efficiency, investment in renewables and reform of the power market there.”
5 Responses to “Top Economists, Russia’s Ex-PM Warns Europe of Steep Rise in Gas Price”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

May 11th, 2006 at 12:05 am
Remember what the Commons Environmental Audit Committee concluded a couple of weeks ago ‘more gas fired power stations will be needed by 2016 to keep the lights on.’
May 11th, 2006 at 2:16 am
Combine the increase in our future electricity bills with those of our rising gas bills (70% increase in the last 18 months) and we have a major impact on our lifestyle to put it mildly
May 11th, 2006 at 3:52 am
Indeed, and what staggers me is how an ‘Environmental Audit Committee’ can advocate building more gas fired power stations under these circumstances. How the hell are people chosen for these committees?
The word from our Energy Minister, Malcolm Wicks, is “we believe that [peak oil] is not imminent and will not be reached until some time after 2030″.
http://www.energybulletin.net/15775.html
Iran was saying the other day that it would be a net importer by 2020. Monbiot disappointed me for the first time with “If we’re to have a hydrogen economy, we have to secure our supplies of natural gas.”
http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2006/04/25/my-new-fondness-for-fossil-fuels/
Or we could build nuke stations for powering the electrolysis of water, but I think Monbiot would rather eat his own leg.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/thermo/electrol.html
May 15th, 2006 at 2:44 pm
The UK Government’s “belief” that we will not reach peak oil until after 2030 is not merely out of synch with the views of self declared ‘peakists’ it’s increasingly contradicted by main stream oil industry sources (with the notable exception of Danile Yergin’s Cambridge Energy Research Associates, who appear to act as cheer leaders for the head-in-sand school of thought).
Here is a a random example I came across recently - Douglas-Westwood Business Research and Information Services produces a “World Oil Supply Report” the third edition, published two years ago is yours for a cool £3200 (good value when you compare it to CERA’s $1 million dollar fee for access to their database). The report notes:
“Ninety-nine countries now produce significant oil, have produced it in the past or will produce it in the future. However, 52, including the USA and Russia, are already well past peak (greater than 5 years) whilst another 6, including the UK and Norway, are just beginning to see declining production and 10, including Australia and China, will reach peak soon. All the remainder will see peak in the next 25 years.
Oil Supply Forecasts
Using four demand growth scenarios, 0%, 1%, 2% and 3%, the study gives for every country and region, for OPEC and the world, oil reserve and resource estimates and a 1930-2050 production profile along with a discussion of the uncertainties.
The World Oil Supply Report concludes that known and yet-to-find reserves and resources may not satisfy even the present level of demand beyond 2020. The report shows that a modest 1% growth in global economic activity increases demand such that a production peak could occur as early as 2016.”
So once again, absent global recession, a minastream industry source’s projections make the government’s forecasts look wildly optimistic. One might contend that the appropriate scenario to base mitigation strategies for dealing with an economy destroying energy gap would be the worst case scenario - instead the government bases policy on the best case scenario that anyone anywhere can dream up. An analogy might be a deep sea diver searching the text books for an example of the least amount of oxygen he might conceivably survive on for his dive and cheerfully filling his tanks accordingly.
When I see them in all seriousness discussing where the retirement age should be fixed for people retiring in 2050 it just beggars belief.
May 15th, 2006 at 4:35 pm
One also has to wonder about Malcolm Wick’s optimism in the light of the fact that last August the financial times reported that Saudi officials have warned that OPEC will be unable to meet projected western oil demand in 10 to 15 years. At today’s prices, the world will need the cartel to boost its production from 30m to 50m barrels a day by 2020 to meet rapidly rising demand, according to the International Energy Agency. According to the Financial Times, senior Saudi Arabian energy officials have privately warned US and European counterparts that OPEC would have an “extremely difficult time” meeting that demand. Saudi Arabia calculates there is a 4.5m b/d gap between what the world needs and what the kingdom can provide. Perhaps the Energy Minister doesn’t read the FT?