Mon 8 Jan 2007
Russian-Belarus oil row rattles EU nerves
Posted by Dan Welch under Economics , Peakist , Geopolitics , RussiaA bitter energy dispute jeopardised oil supplies to western Europe today as Belarus struck out at neighbouring Russia by cutting off a vital transit pipeline crossing Belarusssian territory. The closure of the 2,500-mile Druzhba pipeline (druzhba means “friendship” in Belarussian), one of Europe’s biggest, meant no Russian oil was being pumped along it to Germany, Poland or Ukraine.
The European Union demanded an “urgent and detailed” explanation from Moscow and Minsk, although it said there was no immediate concern over energy supplies because of large reserves in the affected countries.
However, the dispute yet again raised fears in the EU about its growing reliance on energy supplies from Russia.
Russia accused Belarus of illegally siphoning oil from the Druzhba that was destined for German and Polish consumers. The stoppage appeared to be temporary. Belarus’s foreign ministry said a delegation was on its way to Moscow for negotiations. The row has unsettled international energy markets.
In televised comments, Russia’s deputy trade minister, Andrei Sharonov, said the alleged diversion meant it would have to stop supplies through the pipeline. “Now there is a threat to the fulfilment of international contracts between Russian companies and companies in western Europe and eastern Europe,” he said.
Moscow and Minsk are locked in a dispute over oil duties, which has now turned into open enmity, days after Belarus grudgingly accepted a last-minute deal over the doubling in price of its natural gas supplies from Russia this year.
Russia is keen to prevent Belarus, traditionally one of its closest allies in the former Soviet Union, from re-exporting petroleum products made from processing cheap supplies of Russian oil. It recently imposed an export duty of $180 (£93) a tonne on oil sold to Belarus.
Belarus countered that move last week, announcing it would charge an import duty of $45 a tonne on Russian oil shipped to western Europe across its territory. Today’s pipeline stoppage appeared to be a retaliation after Russia refused to pay that shipment tax.
The dispute echoes the “gas war” between Russia and Ukraine last year, although that conflict had a more overtly political component because raised prices reflected Moscow’s displeasure with Kiev’s turn towards the EU and Nato in the wake of the orange revolution in 2004.
Losing patience
Belarus’s hardline leader, Alexander Lukashenko, has been close to the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, and the two countries have a loose political union. But Moscow seems to have lost patience with propping up Mr Lukashenko’s creaking Soviet-style economy.
The Russian gas monopoly, Gazprom, raised gas prices for Belarus from $47 per 1,000 cubic metres to $100 on December 31. Moscow appeared furious at Minsk’s attempt to strike back yesterday and show its ability to disrupt oil supplies to Europe.
Simon Vainshtok, head of the Russian state pipeline operator Transneft, claimed Belarus had been siphoning off Russian oil from the Druzhba pipeline since the weekend.
“On January 6 the Belarussian side, without warning anyone, unilaterally started illegally siphoning off oil from the Druzhba pipeline designed solely for the transportation of oil to consumers in western Europe,” he said.
Mr Vainshtok said Belarus had diverted 79,000 tonnes of oil so far, obliging Russia to seek alternative routes for supplies to European consumers.
The dispute is likely to raise fresh fears that Europe is over-reliant on Russian energy.
“This shows us once again that arguments among various countries of the former Soviet Union … mean that these deliveries are unreliable,” said Piotr Naimski, Poland’s deputy economy minister.
Tom Parfitt and agencies
Monday January 8, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
3 Responses to “Russian-Belarus oil row rattles EU nerves”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

January 10th, 2007 at 3:38 am
Angry Merkel attacks Putin over latest pipeline closure
· Russian pricing row with Belarus alarms EU
· Dispute hastens effort to safeguard energy supplies
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1986536,00.html
January 14th, 2007 at 1:28 pm
Russia risks losing EU contracts for energy supply
· Stern warning for Moscow on future disruptions
· Renewables could replace dependence on oil and gas
David Gow in Brussels
Friday January 12, 2007
The Guardian
The European Union yesterday warned Russia that it must guarantee the reliability of all future oil and gas supplies to Europe or risk the loss of energy contracts and a scaling-down of political contacts.
“We have told them [Moscow] that the disruptions to oil supplies we have seen in the last few days must never, never happen again,” Andris Piebalgs, EU energy commissioner, told the Guardian.
The EU’s stern warning, also delivered to Belarus, came as oil supplies to a handful of European countries hit by the dispute resumed in full after three days of disruption.
Article continues
A letter from Mr Piebalgs and Germany, current holder of the EU presidency, expressed strong disapproval of the way the dispute had affected reliable external customers and urged the pair to settle its root causes as soon as possible.
The row between Russia and Belarus erupted when Moscow doubled gas export prices and imposed crippling export duties, prompting Minsk to slap oil transit duty of $45 a barrel on Russian oil piped across its territory. Moscow closed the Druzhba (Friendship) pipeline that supplies Ukraine, Germany, Poland and other east European nations for more than 60 hours, cutting EU supplies by 1.6m barrels a day or 12% of its total imports.
As Europe flexed its muscles, Mr Piebalgs said: “We are paying for these energy resources and are never late in our payments. We have a right to insist that you never disrupt supply.”
He made plain that Russia’s credibility as a secure supplier was on the line.
Ruling out immediate retaliation as the EU was not in dispute with Russia, he warned that refiners in several European countries hit by disrupted oil supplies could sue Moscow for breach of contract.
“If there’s disruption of supply, it’s not retaliation that’s required but appropriate action … Or you simply conclude that this partner is not worth your trust and you don’t make any more contracts or take political consequences such as reducing contacts,” he said in an interview.
The EU, which imports a quarter of its oil and 42% of its gas from Russia, is considering strengthening its defence mechanisms by greater pooling of its reserves - especially gas.
But Mr Piebalgs said that the way to reduce over-dependence on Russian supplies was to generate Europe’s own energy resources through renewables. Mr Piebalgs, the co-author of Wednesday’s energy strategy which would commit the EU to an energy mix containing 20% renewables by 2020, said: “If you import oil and gas you are importing carbon and we need to produce our own low-carbon energy here.”
He called for increased investment in solar and wave power and said that these technologies could reduce dependence on supplies from overseas. He also urged the EU to adopt his plans to cut consumption by 20%, pointing to the success of UK retailer Tesco in improving the energy efficiency of its new stores by up to 50%.
“Renewables, efficiency and investment in research are the three answers to the problem of security of supply and not fighting the Russians,” he said. “This is not a Russian dilemma but one of the entire developed world in replacing dwindling oil and gas in the medium term.”
Mr Piebalgs also confirmed that the commission favoured the construction of new, low-carbon nuclear plants in countries willing to embrace that technology. But, he said, this could only be done after a full political debate on issues of safety, decommissioning and waste-disposal. Countries closing down older atomic plants must replace them with low-carbon alternatives, he added. “You can’t simply opt for old-fashioned coal-powered plants.”
January 16th, 2007 at 12:53 pm
Russia are just showing their colours more and more. It should come as no surprise when they get tough with a western european state.